|
|
Post by fluffernutter523 on Jul 5, 2010 22:20:47 GMT -5
But channel 5's new "bug" that they use in their newscast isn't visually pleasing. Their old one looked a lot nicer. It looks like this one isn't even in HD.
|
|
|
|
Post by rogertv on Jul 6, 2010 15:11:45 GMT -5
Agreed.
And Eleven At Eleven is hard to read, if you're not in HD.
|
|
|
|
Post by patsx3 on Jul 6, 2010 19:30:18 GMT -5
Agreed. And Eleven At Eleven is hard to read, if you're not in HD. I was going to mention "Eleven at Eleven" as a nitpick of my own. Not because of the graphics though, just because it's the sort of gimmicky crap that I'd sooner expect out of 7. |
|
|
|
Post by bostonmediaguy on Jul 6, 2010 20:12:36 GMT -5
Agreed. And Eleven At Eleven is hard to read, if you're not in HD. I was going to mention "Eleven at Eleven" as a nitpick of my own. Not because of the graphics though, just because it's the sort of gimmicky crap that I'd sooner expect out of 7. Not only that; it's a gimmick that's at least 15 years old. |
|
|
|
Post by dotcomeditor on Jul 7, 2010 13:12:47 GMT -5
One would expect "eleven at eleven" to be something from Channel 11, such as in the New York metro market. If WCVB wants a gimmick, they could do "your weather in the first '5' minutes," just like the CBS affiliate in Atlanta does on its horrible, horrible newscast -- the one with a news reader but not a field reporter in sight.
|
|
